Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

Article Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it currently under consideration for another journal.
  • The use of artificial intelligence in preparing the manuscript is transparently reported (see Author Guidelines)
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format. For other file formats, please contact the Editorial Office.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • I have read the authors' declaration on the publication of articles in NAL-live and agree with its terms.

Instructions for Reviewers

NAL-live uses a peer-review procedure for the first version of newly submitted manuscripts. Peer reviewers can opt to remain anonymous, but the review texts will be published. 

The general task of the peer reviewers is to assess the scientific standards of the articles, keeping in mind that articles are subject to further open discussions and updates according to the procedures of living documents.

Peer reviewers are asked to address the following questions in their review and list items that require revision:

  • Does the article adhere to the scholarly standards in the respective field?
  • For review articles: is the topic comprehensively covered and supported by relevant scientific citations?
  • For research articles: are the research procedures appropriately described and are the primary results deposited in public repositories?
  • Does the article need a major revision requiring re-review before its first version can be published?
  • Can the first version of the article be published with minor or nor revisions?

Instructions for Commenting

Any person registered with their full name and affiliation (if there is any) in ORCID can comment articles or parts of articles in NAL-live. 

  • Commenting style must adhere to scholarly standards, i.e. use scientific arguments and no personal attacks.
  • Every comment will be editorially checked before it is published.
  • Authors can respond to comments at any time - commenters will be notified about responses.
  • Comment threads on a given topic are transparently visible.
  • Commenting can also be used to point out factual errors, or relevant new results published elsewhere.

 

 

Copyright Notice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Atrribution 4.0 International License. Detailed information on this license is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party. For detailed information on how the Leopoldina stores and processes users' personal data, please refer to the Academy's general Data Protection Statement.